3 Comments
User's avatar
Ropr's avatar

Please stop with the UAP designation that tips its hat to the Pentagon narrative. Let's get back to calling them UFOs or flying saucers. Ufology is a mess, but maybe we can at least agree on this one little thing.

Expand full comment
Nik's avatar

As noted above UFOS/UAPs defy both logic & known physics and as such must still be regarded as 'paranormal' anomalies rather than advanced technology.

Expand full comment
The Observer's avatar

We definitely respect that point of view and will be posting a piece in the coming weeks that outlines one author's reasons as to why UFO>UAP.

Expand full comment